Understanding is probabilistic.
Decisions cannot be.

AI reads the unstructured work. A deterministic engine decides. The same case reaches the same outcome — every time, traceable to the policy behind it.

AI interprets. Rules decide.
THE CORE: SAME CASE IN. SAME ANSWER OUT.
Why Avectic exists

Machines can finally read human work. That is the new power — and the new problem.

For the first time, AI can interpret unstructured clinical and operational text at scale. But asked the same question twice, it can answer differently. In work governed by policy, that is disqualifying.

The new power

Comprehension of unstructured work

Free-text plans, notes, and specs become legible to software. The reading problem that blocked automation for decades is effectively solved.

The new problem

Inconsistency on identical inputs

Hand the whole decision to an agent and the same case can resolve differently each run — quick to demo, opaque under audit, impossible to stand behind.

Understanding can be probabilistic. Decisions cannot.
The approach

Two ways to build it. Only one survives an audit.

Conventional — agent decides

Hand everything to the model

01Model reads the case
02Model weighs the policy in its head
03Model emits a decision
→ different every run · opaque under audit
Avectic — rules decide

Split reading from deciding

01AI reads and structures the case
02Only structured facts cross the boundary
03A deterministic engine decides, traceable to policy
→ same case, same outcome · reproducible on demand
PA LogiQ · live decision record

Watch a real, policy-governed decision — then reproduce it.

AI interprets the free-text plan. Structured facts cross the boundary. The engine evaluates them against a named policy revision and writes an auditable record. Run it again: the record is identical.

decision console
Probabilistic · AI reads
Model phrasing varies —
Deterministic · facts cross the boundary
    Only structured facts cross — never the model.
    Deterministic evaluation
      policy
      run
      decision hash
      stamped
      Ready — press run to evaluate and record.
      Illustrative synthetic cases — not clinical or coding guidance. Procedure codes are masked (••••). Criteria and policy identifiers are demonstrations of the record structure, validated in production by credentialed reviewers.
      The mechanism

      One boundary is the whole architecture.

      Only structured facts cross the boundarynever the model.
      PROBABILISTIC · THE MODEL Reads free-text work clinical plan · notes · spec interprets · does not decide BOUNDARY FACTS DETERMINISTIC · THE DECISION Rules engine decides evaluate vs named policy revision emit criterion-by-criterion record reproducible · hash-stable Human in command reviews · approves · owns the outcome
      The economics of delay

      One authorization delay does not stay one problem.

      When a policy-governed decision stalls, the cost compounds downstream. Illustrative magnitudes, one case cascading.

      01 · triggerAuthorization delayed
      1 case held
      02Scheduling slips
      OR / chair time reshuffled
      03Capacity sits idle
      fixed cost, no throughput
      04Revenue recognition slips
      procedure revenue deferred
      05 · tailAppeals accumulate
      rework · staff hours · patient abrasion
      The platform

      PA LogiQ is the first application — not the whole engine.

      The same deterministic core evaluates any policy-governed decision. Each vertical is a channel package on one engine.

      one deterministic engine

      the core

      One deterministic decision engine. AI interprets, rules decide, humans are accountable — identical machinery under every package.

      One engine. Channel packages. Never fork the core.
      Shipping

      Spine LogiQ

      PA LogiQ family · spine prior authorization

      Prior authorization for spine procedures, intake to submission-ready packet. In market.

      Go to the product → palogiq.com

      Shipping

      Infusion LogiQ

      PA LogiQ family · infusion therapy

      Roster-level authorization visibility: dosing windows, reauth timing, step therapy, and site of care.

      Go to the product → palogiq.com

      What holds under audit

      The four properties a decision has to keep.

      Deterministic
      Policy is evaluated, not estimated. The same structured facts produce the same decision on every run — no sampling, no drift.
      Auditable
      Every criterion is checked against a named policy revision. The record shows what was applied, and which version of it.
      Traceable
      The full decision path is recorded and reproducible. Any outcome can be replayed to its inputs and its rule set.
      Human in command
      The decision — and the accountability — stay with your team. The engine proposes and records; a person owns the call.
      Integration

      Built to sit beside your systems — not inside them.

      The same boundary that makes decisions deterministic makes integration simple. The core doesn't need to live in your system of record: it reads what your workflow already produces, and returns a record your systems can consume.

      In · from wherever the work lives

      If it can send text, the core can read it

      • Free-text plans, notes, and specs
      • PDFs, faxes, and portal exports
      • Form and worklist payloads
      • Direct API calls (JSON)
      No rip-and-replace. No data-model migration. In healthcare: procedure descriptions only — PHI stays in your systems.
      ▶▶
      the core
      evaluate · record ▶▶
      Out · to wherever decisions land

      If it can receive structured data, the record fits

      • Structured decision record — JSON, API, webhook
      • Formatted submission packets and documents
      • Audit-log export, criterion by criterion
      • Replay any decision on demand
      The record is the integration: portable, inspectable, reproducible in your own systems.
      A note on this page

      Integration pages in this category tend to be logo walls — turnkey promises that become scoping calls after the contract. Ours is one sentence: if your system can send text and receive structured data, the core fits beside it. Anything deeper — worklist integration, portal automation, system-of-record writeback — gets scoped honestly in the pilot, not promised on a website.

      Bring one real, policy-governed workflow.

      Not a deck marathon — a working session on a workflow you already run, with the record it would produce.

      Request a pilot conversation
      avectic corporation · deterministic decision intelligence